Visualisation made with flourish.studio
The richest in society are having an outsized impact on the climate crisis. The flip side is that inclusive growth (the gains of which do not entirely go to the already-wealthy) is compatible with reducing our carbon emissions in line with the Paris agreement. In the UK, the average person in the top 1% emits 25 times more carbon dioxide equivalent (67 tons per year) than the average person in the bottom 10% (2.6 tons), and 13 times more than the average person in the bottom 50% (4.9 tons). These ratios are even more pronounced in countries like the US and China. Reductions in emissions in recent years have mostly been driven by reduced consumption by the bottom 50%. And the total emissions of the richest in society are equally important; figures from 2015 show that the top 1% in the UK contributed 7% of total emissions, while the bottom 50% contributed 30%. Recent global estimates, which include emissions from investments as well as consumption, suggest that the bottom 50% of the world population emitted 12% of global emissions in 2019, while the top 1% emitted 17% of the total. By 2030, the average per capita consumption emissions of the poorest 50% in the UK are set to fall to a level that is compatible with a 1.5°C rise in global temperatures (2.3 tons of CO2 per year), but the richest 10% will remain five times above it, and the richest 1% will remain 14 times above it.
Explore the context
Explore the arguments
Disadvantage undermines people’s capabilities and opportunities
Disadvantage undermines people’s capabilities and opportunities
Levels of wellbeing are declining
Levels of wellbeing are declining
Many high earners are paid unreasonably large amounts of money
Many high earners are paid unreasonably large amounts of money
Millions are unable to afford decent housing
Millions are unable to afford decent housing
People from poorer backgrounds are less likely to get to and do well at university
People from poorer backgrounds are less likely to get to and do well at university
People from poorer backgrounds do less well at school
People from poorer backgrounds do less well at school
People from poorer backgrounds earn less money
People from poorer backgrounds earn less money
Public services are often worse in deprived areas
Public services are often worse in deprived areas
Socio-economic inequality leads to environmental inequality
Socio-economic inequality leads to environmental inequality
Socio-economic inequality leads to health inequalities
Socio-economic inequality leads to health inequalities
Socio-economic inequality leads to more crime and less effective criminal justice
Socio-economic inequality leads to more crime and less effective criminal justice
Socio-economic inequality leads to political inequality
Socio-economic inequality leads to political inequality
The nature of poverty is changing
The nature of poverty is changing
The structure of our economy leads to huge regional inequalities
The structure of our economy leads to huge regional inequalities
There is little relationship between merit and reward
There is little relationship between merit and reward
Too many people are on low incomes and in insecure work
Too many people are on low incomes and in insecure work
Wealth inequality is much larger than income inequality
Wealth inequality is much larger than income inequality
Wealth is taxed at much lower rates than income
Wealth is taxed at much lower rates than income
Explore the other indicators
Wealth
Wealth
Poverty
Poverty
Living standards
Living standards
Secondary school
Secondary school
Higher education
Higher education
Graduate outcomes
Graduate outcomes
Executive pay
Executive pay
Equal pay
Equal pay
Low pay
Low pay
Income tax
Income tax
Housing quality
Housing quality
Health outcomes
Health outcomes
Carbon emissions
Carbon emissions
Voice
Voice
Fair treatment
Fair treatment